Top 5 image models – overall score
What to use, when
Best for creating a campaign asset in your brand guidelines: GPT Images 2.0
Best for creating physically plausible and believable images: Nano Banana 2.1 or GPT Images 2.0
Best for images that look clean under close inspection: Flux 3, Seedream 5.0 or Nano Banana 2
Best for recreating fonts: GPT Images 2.0
Best for using reference images coherently: GPT Images 2.5 Flare or Nano Banana 2.1
Best for generating assets with the skills of an experienced graphic designer: GPT Images 2.5 Flare
The leaderboard
| Rank (overall) |
Vendor | Model | Brand system adherence |
Realism and physical coherence |
Visual integrity |
Typographic execution |
Reference image fidelity and capability |
Graphic design composition and acumen |
Overall image score |
|---|
* model retired
Data licensed under CC BY 4.0. Please credit "Definition AI" and link to this page.
Subscribe to our monthly Def AI update (models, features, use cases) and our quarterly roundup (the best models for your tasks)
How it works
Our scoring panel is made up of specialist creatives and designers from the Definition brand and marketing team.
They have been creating visual identities, design systems and campaigns for brands like Zizzi, TfL, Celerity, 8×8 and Citi for decades.
We test every major text-to-image model across six core capabilities:
- Brand system adherence
- Realism and physical coherence
- Visual integrity
- Typographic execution
- Reference image fidelity and capability
- Graphic design composition and acumen
Our specialists, led by Eliza Mackay, review outputs designed to test each capability and grade the model out of 10 for each.
We add new models to the table soon after their release. Benchmark programme led by Tom Pallot.
Definition AI gives you access to the models on this leaderboard and guidance from our specialists on how to use them.
Start a trial or book a demo todayMore detail on the scores
When our creative team reviews the outputs, they’re assessing each capability against these criteria:
Brand system adherence
How well can the model create a campaign asset that adheres to a set of brand guidelines?
- Brand colour adherence
- Photography/visual-style adherence
- Use of typographic and graphic characters
- Inclusion of required elements and avoidance of prohibited ones
- Overall coherence and ability to manage multiple constraints
Realism and physical coherence
How physically plausible and believable is the image the model produces?
- Human and animal anatomy
- Object geometry
- Contact and interaction between subjects
- Lighting and shadow consistency
- Materials, scale and overall plausibility
Visual integrity
How clean and artifact-free are the model’s textures and surfaces under close inspection?
- Continuity of repeating surfaces
- Cleanliness of smooth surfaces and gradients
- Edge integrity
- Absence of blocky overlays, ripples, seams and texture bleeding
- Overall image integrity when viewed closely
Typographic execution
How well can the model typeset copy in a specified font and hold its legibility across sizes?
- Typeface fidelity
- Legibility at size
- Spacing quality
- Consistency
- Restraint
Reference image fidelity and capability
How well can the model combine multiple reference images into one coherent new image?
- Preservation of proportions, colours, materials, details
- Correct placement and scale
- Natural integration of the garment onto the person
- Competent integration of the environment
- Preservation of the person’s identity and proportions
Graphic design composition and acumen
How well can the model produce an asset with strong layout, hierarchy, and spacing?
- Visual hierarchy
- Alignment and grid
- Spacing and safe margins
- Balance and use of negative space
- Focal path and overall production usability
- Use of complementary colours